3/25/2023 0 Comments Synkron deny incoming networkSize each cylinder so that, by themselves. By design, making the front frame of the canopy (the part you're lifting) ridged, and it's pivot point relatively sloppy, the schematic above will be more than adequate. Also, I don't see the load being such that compression will be a huge factor. I don't see precise alignment between the two cylinders being of prime importance. In this fashion you have more surface area inside the cylinder working for you.Īssuming you're talking about lifting a metal framed, canvas/fabric covered, canopy over an operator driving some type of earth-moving or tow-motor equipment. First try to revise your layout to push, using the piston-end, rather than pull. "pulling the two front legs of the canopy with pneumatic cylinders" This infers that your retracting the cylinders while lifting the canopy, using the rod-end of the cylinder to do most of the work. Reading into your statement a little deeper and going out onto our shop floor and running a couple of experiments on existing set-ups similar to the schematic I provided above. fluid consumption, existing tank size, etc. But tapping into an existing system adds a few more. smaller cylinders, fluid compression, etc. Switching to hydraulics over pneumatics solves many problems. I've taken a look some different mobile equipment, and not knowing exactly what type you are talking about, I've noticed that most of the ones I've looked at have hydraulic systems rather than pneumatic systems already built into the equipment.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |